Our Customer TT-Control has following issue:
Incident: 5428979
Basically the problem of TTC is that their customers uses spaces when they define device types in holding registers.
The problem results in empty reports.
TTC asks if it is possible to add a validation for the correct naming in the frontend?
Hi Nikolaus, pls confirm with Korbinian. I assume your assumption is correct. :)
kr Oana
Hi Dejvid,
thanks for your feedback.
Can I ask you to confirm that the problem is that if you map a register (holding or input) to a measurement we do not enforce the naming conventions (https://cumulocity.com/guides/concepts/domain-model/#naming-conventions-of-fragments) for measurements and thus allowing whitespace in fragment and series name. This leads to the resulting measurement not being displayable in data point graphs (in addition to other limitation).